archive     message     rss
“So, this is my life. And I want you to know that I am both happy and sad and I'm still trying to figure out how that could be.”


June 18th
285,583 notes
7:17 pm

polagram:

sarahsodaa:

going-for-healthy:

Me and my GG <3

Cutest relationship ever.

OH man! so cute <33 all i could imagine was chris the entire time.

(Source: sosuperawesome, via audkawa)

Filed as: life in a nutshell  

June 12th
1 note
5:50 pm

Filed as: nick hornby   high fidelity   life  

June 10th
466 notes
10:23 pm

(via coffeestains)

June 10th
8 notes
5:44 pm

Filed as: nick hornby   high fidelity   music  

June 9th
3:04 pm

Filed as: nymag   high school   paul feig   writing  

June 8th
7 notes
6:46 pm

(Source: my-chameleon)

May 27th
1 note
10:13 pm

The Long and the Short of It



&#8230; The consensus seemed to be A) You’re very brave and very funny and good on you for asking for help with something you don’t understand; B) This is nothing new: “Women from the 1920s were intentionally rebelling. This haircut is timeless as shit.” (Love you, Hannah.); C) Short hair is “chic,” “unfussy,” “denotes a level of confidence&#8230;eccentricity,” and can help women “stand out” when they have the right facial structure for it; and D) This excellent ’88 essay from Vogue by Joan Juliet Buck that everyone should read (thank you, Lischelt), because it hits the nail on the chicly coiffed head and is beautifully written.
All these answers, though inventive and thoughtful, still left essential pieces of the question unanswered: Does cutting your hair have to mean anything? Or, are we, on some unconscious level, paralyzed by a need to feel &#8216;technically attractive&#8217;? Or is the desire to present yourself however which way you choose a right you own that belongs to only you? Combine that with our &#8220;Future Feminism&#8220; post and the comments therein, and we felt we had a lot more answers to find. (And, for the record, our brand of feminism means &#8220;You go, girl,&#8221; regardless of what you wear or what you do or what you want. That&#8217;s just for the record. Lipstick or no lipstick, full-face or no-makeup makeup, YOU GO, YOU.)

The Long and the Short of It

… The consensus seemed to be A) You’re very brave and very funny and good on you for asking for help with something you don’t understand; B) This is nothing new: “Women from the 1920s were intentionally rebelling. This haircut is timeless as shit.” (Love you, Hannah.); C) Short hair is “chic,” “unfussy,” “denotes a level of confidence…eccentricity,” and can help women “stand out” when they have the right facial structure for it; and D) This excellent ’88 essay from Vogue by Joan Juliet Buck that everyone should read (thank you, Lischelt), because it hits the nail on the chicly coiffed head and is beautifully written.

All these answers, though inventive and thoughtful, still left essential pieces of the question unanswered: Does cutting your hair have to mean anything? Or, are we, on some unconscious level, paralyzed by a need to feel ‘technically attractive’? Or is the desire to present yourself however which way you choose a right you own that belongs to only you? Combine that with our “Future Feminism“ post and the comments therein, and we felt we had a lot more answers to find. (And, for the record, our brand of feminism means “You go, girl,” regardless of what you wear or what you do or what you want. That’s just for the record. Lipstick or no lipstick, full-face or no-makeup makeup, YOU GO, YOU.)

April 23rd
36,385 notes
8:59 pm

March 17th
40 notes
11:26 pm

rocketball:

Oh doctor

rocketball:

Oh doctor

Filed as: erhmagerd   doctor who   sailor moon  

March 17th
2 notes
11:16 pm

tjcksql:

Mean Luna! ㅠㅜ

tjcksql:

Mean Luna! ㅠㅜ

Filed as: luna   sailor moon   my childhood  

s.t.